I was born in India and adopted by my moms. I was born prematurely with cerebral palsy. Early in life, I learned that medical care, therapy, and special education—aren’t signs of weakness. They’re what make it possible for disabled people to grow, learn, and be part of their communities.
That’s why a new immigration rule proposed by the Trump administration worries me so deeply. The rule expands the criteria used to decide whether someone is likely to become a public charge—a label for immigrants who might need government assistance. This sweeping definition is unfair, and harms the rights of disabled immigrants by reducing us to potential liabilities, rather than acknowledging our strengths, families and futures.
My life contradicts this rule in its very essence. I came to the U.S. as a disabled infant. Yes, I needed medical care and early intervention. However, that support helped me grow into the adult I am today. I am a writer, an advocate, a family member, and a friend.
Advocates are especially worried about disabled children born to immigrant parents. These children may be entitled to benefits such as SNAP or Medicaid, but their parents may not apply for these programs for fear that it will jeopardize the immigration status of another family member. That fear can result in disabled children missing out on opportunities to grow, develop, and thrive, and receive less medical care and fewer educational supports.
I understand how vital early support is as I have experienced it myself. I would not have had the same opportunities to grow and learn and participate if I had not had the opportunity to go to school and receive specialized medical care Families often fear seeking help and children suffer the consequences.
Disabled rights groups say it perpetuates a negative stereotype that implies disabled people are more likely to need public support. They think that immigration should be based on the entire person, not just the disability or the likelihood of future benefits being used. Proponents of the idea argue that the tougher requirements is a way to make sure immigrants can support themselves with their own earnings, and limit the burden on taxpayer-funded programs. Critics argue the rule may lead to discrimination and cause undue anxiety among immigrant families, thereby preventing them from receiving critical services.
Disability advocates are urging individuals to comment on the rule as it proceeds through the federal process and express their concerns. The public comments will help them form a final policy that will safeguard immigrant families and respect the dignity of disabled persons.
Disabled immigrants are not a burden. We are human beings with hopes dreams, and families. We deserve policies that honor our humanity.
Sources:
Diament, Michelle. “Trump Administration Rule May Have ‘Chilling Effect’ on Immigrants with Disabilities.” Disability Scoop, 27 July 2026, https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2026/07/27/trump-administration-rule-may-have-chilling-effect-on-immigrants-with-disabilities/32103/